El terrible problema que está destruyendo el fútbol femenino estadounidense



¿Por qué la selección nacional femenina de Estados Unidos está empezando a tener problemas? El USWNT no ha tenido un buen desempeño en los últimos años. La Copa del Mundo de 2023 fue un desastre y una caída masiva parece inminente. ¿Pero por qué? Bienvenidos a Nitro Fútbol. ¡Por favor considere suscribirse! Canal de juegos: @NitroGamingFC Segundo canal: @MoreNitro Instagram: Twitter: business: nitrofootballbusiness@gmail.com desarrollo juvenil de EE. UU. paga para jugar fútbol juvenil de EE. UU. noticias de usmnt noticias de uswnt selección nacional femenina de EE. UU.

Camisetas de futbol Echa un vistazo a nuestra variedad de camisetas de equipos de fútbol. Camisetas de entreno y partido de clubes nacionales y selecciones internacionales.

36 opiniones en “El terrible problema que está destruyendo el fútbol femenino estadounidense”

  7. How come they get payed so much , less matches than mens team ,I thought they wanted equality , they get beaten by 14 year old school boys and retired Senior male players.& Get smashed, Reward talent not mediocrity.

  10. WSL is also putting out money for players now.
    Granted I think we are in really good hands with Emma but the competition is getting better. This is a great thing for the game all around. The Euros were great this last year and so was the Copa America (that final 🤯🤯🤯)

  11. Lived soccer pre and post title IX, and I’ve made these same assertions over the last 30+ years. It was quite a battle for us soccer to let our women play. I think our youth system and professional systems , men and women, are a train wreck but I don’t think there is any stopping or changing it.

  13. Those teams are not better than usa are you kidding? Trin Rodman is a top 5 player on that world stage. Girma is prob number 1 back in the world. Alyssa Thompson and Sophie Smith would start and score for any team in the world. Their depth is crazy. Please explain.

  14. Why is it unexpected for SOCIALIST North Korea to have Women sport team? What do you mean progressive? So only western USA socialists are "progressive"?

    Speaking about sportwashing – America, look at yourself.
    Imagine commiting all these crimes against humanitry terrorism and colonialism around the world and mumbling abput sportwashing.

    First team that should be bammed from all sport tourneys around the World should be USA UK and othe EU countries.

  17. We've been hearing this about UEFA women's teams for about 20 years. Hasn't happened yet. France was supposed to be the next great powerhouse. Didn't happen. Same with Spain. They couldn't win the Euros. These UEFA teams are more technical than the USWNT but the gap is not far enough to outdistance the US advantage in athleticism.

    Ironically, the one Euro team the US DOES have trouble with is Sweden…who is actually LESS technical than the USWNT but CAN match their athleticism.

    TLDR…more money =/= better teams.

  21. what's destroying the men's soccer is a lack of interest…when the youths in the US start to really take interests, you will see thousands of boys that have the build of a Messi and probably far more athletic start to surface..like you said, it's still a feminine sport as compared to basketball and football…

  22. Most uk league football teams have a women's team now, even wrexham have one now, so yes, I agree with what you are saying, and women's league in the uk are getting bigger and bigger and the national team when they play get great attendance's….

  24. What you seem to be ignoring on the Women’s side is the recent developments within the USA program. Emma Hayes is actively developing a huge backlog of very young USA players, giving them good experience. Argurably a B-team USA squad went to Europe in November of last year and drew with England (England was lucky to score the equalizer) before almost 80,000 at Wembly. The same squad beat the Netherlands in their home country’s biggest stadium. The USA has only gotten deeper since that time. When Mallory Swanson and Sophia come back, they won’t be getting the gigantic minutes that we saw at the Olympic, the USA just has way too many great young players stacked up ready to play. Even excellent players like Jayden Shaw and Mia Fishel may never wear a senior National jersey again unless they fill in weak spots that Hayes and her staff have identified. The USA can now afford injuries or maternity time outs by top players and not miss a beat. There is no other top team in the world that can make that claim, Spain is aging across the pitch, with only a couple notable young players. England is aging, with the exception of younger a couple players like Chloe Kelly. Brazil has a decently young squad but Marta had to recently save them against Colombia, with an equalizing and then winning goal, will Marta make it to the 2027 World Cup?

    Emma Hayes have highlighted a rath of teen and barely 20 talented players. The average age of the team is near the low mid 20s, even with older players like Heaps, Sonnett and Lavelle on the team. The USWNT is the only national team that can absorb 2-3 injuries to key players and still have a good chance of winning the 2027 WC, imo. The USA Women should be dominant for this and the next two WC cycles. But then you say what happens after that? Emma Hayes has several times mentioned the development pipeline and she is doing efforts to improve both talented player identification AND coaching in the junior and beginner levels – well before a girl can ever dream of donning a National Team jersey for either U-17, U-20, U-23 and certainly the Senior team. Hayes is implementing her vision for a USA player and coaching pipeline that goes out past the next 10-15 years, if she is successful at that (her early success looks exceptional), the USA should be a world level force for at least the next two decades. The USA just set up a national training facility in Georgia, backed by a billionaire.

    While you make a legitimate argument about the young player pipeline, that is far more of a concern on the boys and men’s side. Even with the rising WNBA, women in the USA have only two player sports career paths, Soccer and Basketball. On the boys and men’s side, there is American Football (an enormous multi-billion dollar per year enterprise, despite derision from Europeans), Basketball (another multi-billion dollar enterprise), Major League Baseball (a third multi-billion dollar per year enterprise) and The NHL (not as big as the other three, but still massive in this country and Canada). Those men’s leagues attracts the best players from the USA and Canada and worldwide – so the pool of talent for Soccer is vastly depleted in the grade school level for boys (who eventually become men). You are using an apples and oranges analysis on the troubles with the men’s national team and are trying to project them onto the women’s national team, that is just wrong, because the critical factor (vast access to the most talented athletes early on) isn’t remotely the same for the women’s and men’s teams.

    On the women’s side, we likely will always be at the top or near the very top. It is simple why. We can throw money at a problem to fix it, Europe and no other region has shown the capacity to do that. We had substandard coaching of the women in the 2023 cycle, well simply pay Emma Hayes over a $million per year and get her to return to the country that gave her a start in coaching Soccer. Then she brings in top European assistants and pull in top USA assistants – all that cost money, which is being supplied.

    BTW. I really believe that you are underestimating Mexico’s women big time. That team has a brilliant new coach who has that team on a big move to the top. Canada is slowed by age and injury but that national team has a very good coach, who is going to get them back as one of the world’s top teams – she just has to do what Emma Hayes did, retire aging players, despite their legend, and start building an aggressive very young squad. Canada has less time to work that out before 2027, Emma Hayes has the USA about a year ahead of Canada, imo. Hayes should be able to tune and tweak a formidable team during early 2027 and should have the best team at the 2027 World Cup by a good margin. But Mexico and Canada will be dangerous and any European national team that takes them lightly will get sent home early.

  27. I think the women will still be elite, the end result just might not be trophies as frequently as in the past. England, Spain, France, Japan and Germany will be tough for years to come. Brazil are resurging as well.

  28. Yes the competition is getting more fierce. But the recent challenges of the USWNT have had more to do with US Soccer than what you're talking about. For too long they stuck with obviously declining veterans, especially Meghan Rapinoe and Morgan (but others as well), which destroyed the opportunity of promising younger players are now themselves considered too old to be considered. The proof is that ever since the US hired Emma Hayes to coach the USWNT, she cleared the team of the old players and now it's the US who have way more promising young players on the team, with huge competition 2-4 players deep to even make the team! Also, it's the European teams that look to have a lack of young players as none of the current top 3 teams in the world are European (US, Brazil, Japan). The US league is also attracting more non-US players than Europe is attracting non-European players. Emma Hayes is also trying to duplicate the European farm system and has recently restarted the U-23 US team. Things seem to be looking up after a very weak decline.

  29. My daughter started football at 6 years old, ended up at a top tier club a 1.5 hr one way drive three evenings a week for training, won club state championships, made and started for state level and western region ODP teams, flew all over the US for games and tournaments, 4 year starter on a league winning college team. Cost a fortune, although got most of it back with university scholarships. Throughout, I knew the quality of development, at every level, was poor compared to boys, and now girls, in Europe. Watch videos of young female and male in footballers in Europe…they’re immeasurably better.

  30. The NWSL’s roster rules were (are) truly a hinderance. The draft, discovery players, foreign national team player slots and other stuff. I don’t think the UK rules are as disjoined post BREXIT. (Protectionist for home grown but allow (allowed) for easy entry of top level EU & other national team players – at least as of 2020. The USA work visa rules also favors those performers and sportspersons with exceptional skills.) But most of the rest of the world operates under the FIFA umbrella of single club registration, protections for youth players and transfer system. Fairly uniform rules that “everyone” understands and knows how to bend (ha ha).

  31. Title IX boosted woman’s soccer in the USA. The universities provided teams and high level skill development. At one time (possibly still true) teens and young women from abroad, often the UK, came to the unis for training, coaching and to learn the USA style. Back in 2015 UK women’s football (soccer) had several pathways – start with a club youth program and hope to get a spot on a women’s premier club – mostly semi-pro and ultimately a spot on the ENG WNT; or come to the USA and do several years of NCAA eligibility. These foreign players are attrractive because they have good skills and often had trained with the top level woman’s club players or actually in the past played in the top league. Today’s pay system where $$ are needed to attend the top camps or get on the best clubs closes the door to many individuals. The UK & other EU clubs try to home grow a pipeline and hope to collect tranfers fess, etc. to offset the cost. Can a MSL or NWSL club compete with the likes of Real M, Chelsea, Utd, Bayern München when they decide to go all in on a pipeline?

    The ENG Women’s pro league is well stocked with those who took the club-uni route. For example, there is Rachel Daly (Leeds, Lincoln Ladies in the top league, St John’s🧡, and then ENG Super League & WNT); another is Alessia Russo (Charlton Athletic youth, Chlsea, UNC uni, then ENG Super league, ManUtd and Arsenal). An all club example is Alex Greenwood (Everton Youth & Women club, Notts County, Liverpool, ManUtd, OL, & ManCity plus ENGWNT). Greenwood represents IMO the proffessional nature and lived through the transition of women’s football in ENG from semi-pros to top level being a true pro sport. Back in 2015 Alex identified herself as a “professional footballer” on her “X” (then Twitter) when many did not (so did Alex Scott). Alex has moved from club to club to advance her career (for example from ManUtd to OL, etc.)

  32. August 7, FIFA Rankings: Spain #1, USA #2, then Sweden*, England, Germany, France, … & the other usual, CAN, BRA, JAP, DRK; the UK and EU have upped the game. *Often the “Kryptonite” of the USWNT.

    The Football Association, there is only one “The Football Association,” circa 2011 took steps to elevate the England W National Team by forming the Woman’s Super League (WSL) placed above the existing “Premier League.” (GB was embarrassed in the 2012 Olympics in the UK.) A second level was added with promo&relegation in 2014, a total rebrand for 2018 with the Super League on top and the Woman’s Championship a step down (this was the year Manchester United finally reinstated a woman’s club – the inaugural Championship League Champions; ManCity had moved up in 2014). In 2015 many of the WSL and England National Team players were semi-pro whereas from 2018 in the WSL they’re pros. And around 2018 or so the England WSL became a destination for EU national players – e.g., Pernille Harder, and transfer fees. Brexit obviously changed the landscape.

    Spain also has shot up.

    BTW Real Madrid bought an existing club (TACÓN) to form a nucleus. Compare ManUtd that in 2018 had no women’s club but had Casey Stoney, a number of disgruntled former Liverpool teammates of Casey and lots of ManUtd youth academy who had no path to the top level until then – e.g., Ella Toone, Katey Zelem (former captain now with Angel City) – plus other talent. DISCLAIMER: MANUTD fan here. I’ve drifted away from the WSL & Utd but can say 2018-2020 at least, prob still true, the ManUtd fans were fanatics of both clubs because they were ManUtd Reds – the one club mentality. They had (have?) a reputation of traveling to the women teams away matches and making more noise than the hometeam.

  34. 1:30 Volleyball and basketball were easier and cheaper to add. Most schools already had the courts, balls, and net systems/backboards for the boys' teams, even if the school didn't have enough space to have a field for football or soccer. Also, by participation, girl's soccer has never been more popular than track & field (the most popular), basketball, and volleyball in the USA.

    Even today, track & field and volleyball both have (estimated) more than 100,000 more high school participants than soccer, and basketball has ~30,000 more participants.

    Women's soccer is, of course, popular in the USA for a high school and/or college sport, but it lags behind the three I previously mentioned. And, honestly, it always has.

  35. Everyone claiming pay to play system is broken has no clue about the realities of US soccer and World Soccer. The reason why pay to play does not exist in most major soccer powers is because the professional club system is present throughout the country. There are so many pro teams and nearly all of them have some type of youth program that they sponsor. In the US we have what 40 teams with “academies” (MLS and USL). That leaves a huge swath of cities and towns with no options if we rely solely on “free” systems

Comentarios cerrados.