¿Debería preocuparse el USMNT después de la derrota ante Japón?



Suscríbete a nuestro canal para obtener más contenido de fútbol: – Síguenos en Twitter: – Me gusta en Facebook: – Síguenos en Instagram: Para obtener más información sobre la MLS, visita el sitio web oficial de la liga:

Camisetas de futbol Echa un vistazo a nuestra variedad de camisetas de equipos de fútbol. Camisetas de entreno y partido de clubes nacionales y selecciones internacionales.

24 opiniones en “¿Debería preocuparse el USMNT después de la derrota ante Japón?”

  1. The midfield tried to back pass to the defense and the defenders were so withdrawn that it appeared to be a turnover from the midfielders. People say Long shouldn't have been in the game. I say Long AND Zimmerman don't belong on the team. MLS Americans usually aren't good enough. Unless they are like 18 yrs old

  2. The performance wasn’t good, but the worst was the coaching performance. The opposition was sending extra players forward predicting our dogmatic attachment to playing from the back. The pitch was slow and choppy on top of it. But time after time after time, we played directly into the hands of the opposing team. Japan is a quality team, so simply allowing them to play their pressing game with no adjustments, it was infuriating to watch. The simple interceptions became predictable.

  3. Brandon Vazquez is better than Jordan Pefok. Vazquez has great feet, and people accused him of having bad feet. He constantly makes runs behind the defense, and he can definitely finish a header too. He’s a skill player though, not just a poacher.

  4. Judging by some of these comments, I realize I don’t need to listen to this to know it’s rubbish. Long was awful, Morris is useless, Ferreira can’t score and Berhalter needs to be fired. All clear as day but we will never be serious if we try to to force these players and coach that aren’t good enough and shun better players playing in better leagues.

  5. Once upon a time national teams at the World Cup (Hungary/Soviet Union/England) utilized a core group/majority from a succesful single club team that had, for instance, won the domestic league/excelled at continental competition to ensure continuity/familiarity with one another, in turn translate to on-field success. You couldn't even do that with the USMNT today because a) successful MLS teams are by and large made up of foreign players; and b) by and large, national team selection defaults (mostly) to Americans playing overseas. So you get these disparate displays of players from different club environments mashed together on short notice to try and play as a "team." Could you even field a USMNT made up of players from, say, Union/Red Bull NY/LAFC/Austin, and expect anything better than today?

Comentarios cerrados.